Topical v systemic agent treatment for papulopustular acne. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
R S Stern, T M Pass, A L Komaroff
Index: Arch. Dermatol. 120 , 1571-1578, (1984)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
We used cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the costs, risks, and benefits of two strategies for clearing papulopustular acne; topical therapy alone as initial therapy or a combination of systemic antibiotics and topical agents used at the first visit. Patients treated with combination therapy had fewer weeks of morbidity from acne, and lower dollar costs but have a greater risk of side effects. If the topical therapy alone was chosen to reduce the risk of side effects in a population of patients there would be an additional $764 in costs and 238 weeks of morbidity from acne to avert a single additional instance of side effects. Initial treatment of papulopustular acne with combined oral antibiotics and topical agents thus seems to be cost-effective. After clearing is achieved, maintenance therapy with topical agents should be considered.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
Topical antibiotics in dermatology.
1988-11-01
[Arch. Dermatol. 124 , 1691-1700, (1988)]
The use of antibiotics in acne therapy: oral or topical administration?
1982-08-01
[J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 10 , 89-115, (1982)]