Journal of Economic Entomology 2012-08-01

Baseline susceptibility of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from California to select insecticides.

Nilima Prabhaker, Carmen Gispert, Steven J Castle

Index: J. Econ. Entomol. 105(4) , 1392-400, (2012)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

Between 2006 and 2008, 20 populations of Planococcus ficus (Signoret), from Coachella and San Joaquin Valleys of California were measured in the laboratory for susceptibility to buprofezin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, methomyl, and imidacloprid. Toxicity was assessed using a petri dish bioassay technique for contact insecticides and by a systemic uptake technique for imidacloprid. Mixed life stages were tested for susceptibility to all insecticides except for buprofezin, which was measured against early and late instars (first, second, and third). Dose-response regression lines from the mortality data established LC50 and LC99 values by both techniques. Responses of populations from the two geographical locations to all five insecticides varied, in some cases significantly. Variations in susceptibility to each insecticide among sample sites showed a sevenfold difference for buprofezin, 11-fold to chlorpyrifos, ninefold to dimethoate, 24-fold to methomyl, and 8.5-fold to imidacloprid. In spite of susceptibility differences between populations, baseline toxicity data revealed that all five insecticides were quite effective based on low LC50s. Chlorpyrifos was the most toxic compound to Planococcus ficus populations as shown by lowest LC50s. Buprofezin was toxic to all immature stages but was more potent to first instars. The highest LC99 estimated by probit analysis of the bioassay data of all 20 populations for each compound was selected as a candidate discriminating dose for use in future resistance monitoring efforts. Establishment of baseline data and development of resistance monitoring tools such as bioassay methods and discriminating doses are essential elements of a sustainable management program for Planococcus ficus.


Related Compounds

Related Articles:

Effect of repeated applications of buprofezin and acephate on soil cellulases, amylase, and invertase.

2014-10-01

[Environ. Monit. Assess. 186(10) , 6319-25, (2014)]

Effects of pyriproxyfen and buprofezin on immature development and reproduction in the stable fly.

2012-12-01

[Med. Vet. Entomol. 26(4) , 379-85, (2012)]

Action threshold for applying insect growth regulators to tomato for management of irregular ripening caused by Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae).

2002-04-01

[J. Econ. Entomol. 95(2) , 372-6, (2002)]

Compatibility of the entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium muscarium and insecticides for eradication of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci.

2005-08-01

[Mycopathologia 160(1) , 35-41, (2005)]

Ecotoxicological effects of buprofezin on fecundity, growth, development, and predation of the wolf spider Pirata piratoides (Schenkel).

2008-11-01

[Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 55(4) , 652-8, (2008)]

More Articles...