The more basic isoform of eEF1A relates to tumour cell phenotype and is modulated by hyper-proliferative/differentiating stimuli in normal lymphocytes and CCRF-CEM T-lymphoblasts.
Bruna Scaggiante, Barbara Dapas, Gabriele Pozzato, Gabriele Grassi
Index: Hematol. Oncol. 31(2) , 370-6, (2013)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
The elongation factor 1A proteins (eEF1A1/A2) are known to play a role in tumours. We previously found that a more basic isoform of eEF1A (MBI-eEF1A) is present in the cytoskeletal/nuclear-enriched extracts of CCRF-CEM T-lymphoblasts but not in those of normal lymphocytes. To obtain deeper knowledge about MBI-eEF1A biology, we investigate from which of the eEF1A proteins, eEF1A1 or eEF1A2, MBI-eEF1A originates and the possibility that its appearance can be modulated by the differentiated or proliferative cell status. CCRF-CEM T-lymphoblasts and normal lymphocytes were cultured with or without differentiation/pro-proliferative stimuli (Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA) alone or the combination of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) with PMA, respectively), and the presence of MBI-eEF1A evaluated together with that of the eEF1A1/A2 mRNAs. Our data indicate that the MBI-eEF1A may derive from eEF1A1 as eEF1A2 is not expressed in CCRF-CEM and normal lymphocytes. Moreover, MBI-eEF1A is inducible in normal lymphocytes upon hyper-proliferative stimuli application; in CCRF-CEM, its presence can be abrogated by PMA-induced differentiation. Finally, MBI-eEF1A may have a functional role in hyper-proliferating/tumour cells as its disappearance reduces the growth of CCRF-CEM and that of PHA/PMA-stimulated lymphocytes. The presented data suggest that MBI-eEF1A may be related to oncogenic cell phenotype, rising the possibility to use MBI-eEF1A as target for novel therapeutic strategies.Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2010-03-15
[Chem. Res. Toxicol. 23(3) , 497-503, (2010)]
Cutaneous toxicity of 2-chloroethyl methyl sulfide in isolated perfused porcine skin.
1990-06-01
[Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 104(1) , 167-79, (1990)]
1997-01-01
[J. Androl. 18(2) , 139-50, (1997)]
1996-06-01
[Carcinogenesis 17(6) , 1361-4, (1996)]